State v. Hardy
State v. Hardy, 622 So. 2d 858 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993).
Cited by
- State v. McGee 663 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- State v. May 639 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- State v. Ruiz 630 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Opinion text
LANDRIEU, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in part and respectfully dissent in part. I join with the majority in affirming defendant’s conviction. However, I would vacate the sentence and remand the matter to the trial court for re-sentencing. The sentence of six years imposed by the trial court is twice the maximum sentence recommended by the sentencing guidelines and represents a gross deviation not supported by the record. *864 The only fact in the record that could support such a deviation is defendant’s possession of a dangerous weapon. That, of course, is the very offense of which he was convicted and has been taken into consideration by the sentencing guidelines in establishing the recommended sentence.