No. 92-KA-1761 Precedential Processed

State v. Hardy

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed August 3, 1993 · 622 So. 2d 858

Cited by

Opinion text

LANDRIEU, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in part and respectfully dissent in part. I join with the majority in affirming defendant’s conviction. However, I would vacate the sentence and remand the matter to the trial court for re-sentencing. The sentence of six years imposed by the trial court is twice the maximum sentence recommended by the sentencing guidelines and represents a gross deviation not supported by the record. *864 The only fact in the record that could support such a deviation is defendant’s possession of a dangerous weapon. That, of course, is the very offense of which he was convicted and has been taken into consideration by the sentencing guidelines in establishing the recommended sentence.