State ex rel. Thompson v. Whitley
Also decided on this docket: La., November 4, 1994 644 So. 2d 1066
State ex rel. Thompson v. Whitley, 642 So. 2d 1303 (La. 1994).
Cited by
- State v. Thompson 825 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
- Guichard Drilling Co. v. Alpine Energy Serv., Inc. 657 So. 2d 1307 La. 1995
- Goings v. State 648 So. 2d 884 La. 1995
- Supreme Contractors, Inc. v. Halliburton Logging Services, Inc. 648 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Opinion text
PER CURIAM: * Granted in part; denied in part. This case is remanded to the district court for purposes of conducting an evidentiary hearing on relator’s claim that the state knew or should have known that Richard “Funk” Perkins lied at trial about his knowledge of, or the benefit he hoped to derive from, the reward offered by the victim’s family and that the state did nothing to correct the witness’s testimony disavowing any motive or bias in the case. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 , 105 S.Ct. 3375 , 87 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985); Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 , 79 S.Ct. 1173 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1217 (1959). In all *1304 other respects, petitioner’s original and supplemental applications are denied. MARCUS and WATSON, JJ., dissent from the order. Hall, J., not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.