No. 92-KH-0430
Precedential
Denied
Processed
State v. Matherly
State v. Matherly, 595 So. 2d 655 (La. 1992).
Cited by
Criticized in 1
- Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 934 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- John Hebert, Et Ux. v. Rapides Parish Police Jury La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Hussey v. Russell 934 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
- Boutte v. Kelly 863 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
- Davis v. Witt 831 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
- Edwards v. Daugherty 729 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
- Eppinette v. City of Monroe 698 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
- Reichert v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 674 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- Reichert v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 674 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- Delphen v. Dept. of Transp. & Dev. 657 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
- Guillen v. TRANSIT MANAGE. OF SE LA 648 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
- Cornish v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOP. & DEV. 647 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Opinion text
In re Matherly, Danny; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 91KW-2290; Parish of St. Ber *656 nard, 34th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, Nos. 132-635, 132-634, 138-160. Denied.