Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ratcliff v. State, 623 So. 2d 1326.

13 citing documents.

  • State v. Odle 834 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir.), writ denied, writ denied, where the record did not indicate whether the defendant's convictions were based on La.R.S.
  • State v. Hayden 767 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Martin 730 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    3 Cir.), writ denied, writ denied
  • State v. Ash 729 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    1992), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Bernard 734 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    3 Cir.1992), writ denied, writ denied, this court stated the following in regards to proving intent to distribute: The intent to distribute may be established by proving circumstances surrounding defendant's possession which give rise to reasonable inferences of intent to distribute.
  • State v. Degruy 689 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    App. 3 Cir.1992), writ denied , writ denied
  • State v. Spencer 683 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    3 Cir.), writ denied, writ denied, this court stated the following in regards to proving intent: The intent to distribute may be established by proving circumstances surrounding defendant's possession which give rise to reasonable inferences of intent to distribute.
  • State v. Green 683 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Harris 684 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    3 Cir.), writs denied, and this court stated the following in regards to proving intent: The intent to distribute may be established by proving circumstances surrounding defendant's possession which give rise to reasonable inferences of intent to distribute.
  • State v. King 683 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    3 Cir.), writ denied, writ denied
  • Louisiana Farms v. LA. Dept. of Wildlife 685 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Bruser 661 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State ex rel. Johnson v. State 626 So. 2d 1183 La. 1993