DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lingle, 609 So. 2d 222.

16 citing documents.

  • State v. Odle 834 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir.), writ denied, writ denied, where the record did not indicate whether the defendant's convictions were based on La.R.S.
  • State v. Hayden 767 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    3 Cir.1992), writ denied, and writ denied State ex rel.
  • State v. Martin 730 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    3 Cir.), writ denied, writ denied
  • State v. Ash 729 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 1992), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Bernard 734 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    3 Cir.1992), writ denied, writ denied, this court stated the following in regards to proving intent to distribute: The intent to distribute may be established by proving circumstances surrounding defendant's possession which give rise to reasonable inferences of intent to distribute.
  • State v. Haley 709 So. 2d 992 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Jack 700 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    3 Cir.1992), writ denied, which are utilized in determining whether a person possessing controlled substances also has an intent to distribute those substances.
  • State v. Kendrick 699 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Degruy 689 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    App. 3 Cir.1992), writ denied , writ denied
  • State v. Spencer 683 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    3 Cir.), writ denied, writ denied, this court stated the following in regards to proving intent: The intent to distribute may be established by proving circumstances surrounding defendant's possession which give rise to reasonable inferences of intent to distribute.
  • State v. Green 683 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Harris 684 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    3 Cir.), writs denied, and this court stated the following in regards to proving intent: The intent to distribute may be established by proving circumstances surrounding defendant's possession which give rise to reasonable inferences of intent to distribute.
  • State v. King 683 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    3 Cir.), writ denied, writ denied
  • State v. Walker 684 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    3 Cir.), writ denied, writ denied, 623 So.2d *14 1326 (La.1993), to prove intent: The intent to distribute may be established by proving circumstances surrounding defendant’s possession which give rise to reasonable inferences of intent
  • Louisiana Farms v. LA. Dept. of Wildlife 685 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    3 Cir.), writs denied, (La.
  • State v. Bruser 661 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    3 Cir.1992), writ denied, & writ denied, State ex rel.