Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stockle v. Zimmer, USA, 619 So. 2d 1059.

583 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Carlos Dewayne Wade La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Derrick Duncan La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Dana Combs La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Babineaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State Of Louisiana v. Steven Staggs La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State Of Louisiana v. Michael Lee Jackson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Paul Ford La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Rusty Leboeuf La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Jones 273 So. 3d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State v. Kennon 273 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State v. Flores 268 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State v. Jackson 268 So. 3d 1217 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Albert Abshire La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
-60 (La.1993), the supreme court explained: If the defendant does not allege any specific ground for excessiveness or present any argument or evidence not previously considered by the court at original sentencing, then the defendant does not lose the right to appeal the sentence; the defe
State v. Abshire 269 So. 3d 1020 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
In State v. Mims , , 1059-60 (La.
State v. Latique 265 So. 3d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Under State v. Mims , when a Defendant's motion to reconsider sentence merely alleges that the sentence is excessive, he is "simply relegated to having the appellate court consider the bare claim of excessiveness."
State of Louisiana v. Elijah James Latique La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
13 when a Defendant’s motion to reconsider sentence merely alleges that the sentence is excessive, he is “simply relegated to having the appellate court consider the bare claim of excessiveness.” Id.
State v. Duhon 270 So. 3d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See State v. Mims , , 1059-1060 (La.
State v. Lewis 260 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Minor 254 So. 3d 1278 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Williams 250 So. 3d 1200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Lewis 244 So. 3d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Casaday 247 So. 3d 1057 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Casaday , 162 So.3d at 594 , citing State v. Mims , (La.
State v. Pittman 248 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Traylor 246 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Simon 245 So. 3d 1149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Harris 235 So. 3d 1354 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
State v. Stewart 245 So. 3d 289 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Mays 245 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. White 228 So. 3d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Harrison 244 So. 3d 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Mouton 219 So. 3d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Campbell 217 So. 3d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Purvis 217 So. 3d 620 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Calhoun 216 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Christopher 209 So. 3d 255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Ward 209 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Scott 209 So. 3d 248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Jackson 206 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Smith, 50,342 (La.App.
State v. Williams 207 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Jones, 41,449 (La.App.
State v. Thompson 202 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Stringer 200 So. 3d 883 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Jones, 41,449 (La.App.2d Cir.9/20/06), ; State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), .
State v. Scott 195 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
-60 (La.1993) (per curiam).
State v. Collier 194 So. 3d 25 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Allen, 49,642 (La.App.2d Cir.2/26/15), , writ denied, 15-0608 (La.1/25/16), .
State v. Law 189 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Dwane Edward Fox La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
We conclude that, this is insufficient to satisfy the requirements of La.Code Crim.P.
State v. Fox 184 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
We conclude that, this is" insufficient to satisfy the requirements of La.Code Crim.P.
State v. Modique 186 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
P. art. 881.1; State v. Boyd, 46,321 (La.
State v. Smith 184 So. 3d 241 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Jones, 41,449 (La.App.
State v. Miller 185 So. 3d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Hebert 181 So. 3d 795 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Williams, 45,755 (La.App.2d Cir.11/3/10), , writs denied, 10-2684 (La.4/25/11), , 10-2706 (La.4/25/11), State v. Bass, 49,804 (La.App.2d Cir.7/8/15), .