DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stockle v. Zimmer, USA, 619 So. 2d 1059.

583 citing documents.

  • State v. Sanders 842 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    his appeal is therefore limited to the bare claim of excessiveness.
  • State v. Klasek 843 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Durden 842 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.
  • State v. Johnson 839 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Raev 839 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), .
  • State v. Brooks 841 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Holmes, 94-907 (La.App.
  • State v. Thornton 836 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Decay 833 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Holmes, 94 -907 (La.App.
  • State v. Long 830 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), .
  • State v. Tracy 831 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    5 Cir. 6/27/01) , ( , 1060 (La.1993); State v. Holmes, 94-907 (La.App.
  • State v. Yates 828 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Hall 828 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Felder 823 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Daggs 823 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.02/25/98), .
  • State v. Willis 823 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    art. 881.1; State v. Stevens, 33,700 (La.App.
  • State v. Batchelor 823 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Odom 821 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), .
  • State v. Johnson 821 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), .
  • State v. Taylor 821 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Sullivan 817 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Harbor 817 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Holmes, 94 -907 (La.App.
  • State v. Jordan 813 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Sharp 810 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Keith 811 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), .
  • State v. Williams 811 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Holmes, 94 -907 (La.App.
  • State v. Johnson 812 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Malloy 815 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Anderson 807 So. 2d 956 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Bowen 806 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Lawson 802 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), .
  • State v. West 801 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that when a defendant fails to provide any specific ground for excessiveness upon which the motion to reconsider is based "then the defendant does not lose the right to appeal the sentence; the defendant is simply relegated to having the appellate court consider the ba
  • State v. Gatlin 803 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Flaherty 803 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Hansbro 796 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), .
  • State v. Ratliff 796 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Since the defendant's motion for reconsideration of sentence merely alleged that the sentence is excessive, he is "simply relegated to having the appellate court consider the bare claim of excessiveness."
  • State v. Baker 796 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Adger 797 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), .
  • State v. Decay 798 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Holmes, 94 -907 (La.
  • State v. Miller 792 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Richardson 790 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Barber 793 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    he is "simply relegated to having the appellate court consider the bare claim of excessiveness."
  • State v. Robertson 792 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), .
  • State v. Hymes 787 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Berkeley 788 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Young 786 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Dyer 794 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    However, the Louisiana Supreme Court decided that failing to file a motion to reconsider relegates a defendant to a "bare claim of excessiveness."
  • State v. Williams 786 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Tribbit, 00-153 (La.App.
  • State v. Williams 786 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Holmes, 94-907 (La.App.
  • State v. McNeal 785 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Duncan, 30,453 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), .
  • State v. Furgerson 781 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Since the motion for reconsideration merely alleged that the sentence is excessive, Furgerson is "simply relegated to having *1281 the appellate court consider the bare claim of excessiveness."