Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Carter v. Barber Bros. Contracting Co., 629 So. 2d 1180.

18 citing documents.

State in the Interest of E.A.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State ex rel. E.A.D. 250 So. 3d 1237 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Jones v. Americas Insurance Co. 226 So. 3d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Byrd v. Pulmonary Care Specialists, Inc. 209 So. 3d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, (La.
State v. Thurman 18 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir.), writ denied, stated: La.R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Jake M. Thurman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir.), writ denied, stated: La.R.S.
Steinhoff v. Steinhoff 843 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
1 Cir.), writ denied, : "The appellant has the duty to secure either a transcript of the testimony or a narrative of facts; the inadequacy of the record is imputable to the appellant."
Oliver v. Cal Dive Intern., Inc. 844 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
1st Cir.), writ denied, (La.
Luper v. Wal-Mart Stores 844 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Dufrene v. Morgan Equipment Rental, Inc. 754 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1 Cir.), writ denied, (1993), holding the prescriptive period for an employee to file a claim began on the date payments for temporary total disability benefits stopped.
First Nat. Bank of Commerce v. Keyworth 738 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
1 Cir.1993), writ denied, Miller v. Potier, 94-1000 (La.App.
Bradford v. Kaster 732 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
5 Cir.), writ denied, "[w]hat is and what is not an unreasonable risk of harm is a factual issue for a judge or a jury to resolve."
Distinguished State v. Lambert 720 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
3 Cir.), writ denied, involved a defendant who stated he did not begin to drink until after the accident in which he was involved.
Barrois v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 703 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
App. 1 Cir.1993), writ denied, Miller v. Potier, 94-1000 (La.App.
Deshautelles v. South Central Bell Telephone Co. 694 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
1st Cir.), writ denied, Sea Tang Fisheries, Inc. v. You’ll See Sea Foods, Inc., (La.App.
State in Interest of Rlk 666 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Mahl v. Himel 657 So. 2d 1386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
5 Cir.1993), writ denied
Miller v. Potier 649 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
1 Cir.), writ denied, : "The appellant has the duty to secure either a transcript of the testimony or a narrative of facts; the inadequacy of the record is imputable to the appellant."