Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hunter, 630 So. 2d 688.
-
State v. Jones
165 So. 3d 217
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
(per curiam); State v. Taylor, 12-0114, p. 6 (La.App.
-
State v. Jones
33 So. 3d 306
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
*321 In State v. Windham, 93-686 (La.12/20/93), (per cu-riam), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In the absence of a contemporaneous objection at the multiple offender hearing, the defendant otherwise may not complain for the first time on review that the records of his guilty pleas introduced by the State at the multiple offender hearing did not reflect com
- State v. Brister 966 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
-
State v. Hunter
768 So. 2d 687
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
art. 841; State v. Jackson, 31,433 (La.
- State v. Jackson 767 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
- State v. Boles 763 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
-
State v. Stokes
759 So. 2d 980
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Richmond, 98-1015 (La.App.
-
State v. Crawford
749 So. 2d 728
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that [i]n the absence of a contemporaneous objection at the multiple offender hearing, the defendant otherwise may not complain for the first time on review that the records of his guilty pleas introduced by the state at the multiple offender hearing did not reflect com
- State v. Watts 735 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
-
State v. Richmond
734 So. 2d 33
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In the absence of a contemporaneous objection at the multiple offender hearing, the defendant otherwise may not complain for the first time on review that the records of his guilty pleas introduced by the State at the multiple offender hearing did not reflect complia
-
State v. Richmond
734 So. 2d 33
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In the absence of a contemporaneous objection at the multiple offender hearing, the defendant otherwise may not complain for the first time on review that the records of his guilty pleas introduced by the State at the multiple offender hearing did not reflect complia
- State v. Post 729 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
- State v. Jackson 726 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
-
State v. Bell
709 So. 2d 921
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
the court stated that: In the absence of a contemporaneous objection at the multiple offender hearing, the defendant otherwise may not complain for the first time on review that the records of his guilty peals introduced by the state at the multiple offender hearing did not reflect compliance with this