No. 93-KK-2352
Precedential
Processed
State v. Hall
State v. Hall, 623 So. 2d 1286 (La. 1993).
Opinion text
CALOGERO, C.J., and DENNIS, J., concur in the writ denial, but express the view that the defendant may seek anew from the district judge a ruling prohibiting the state’s arguing especial heinousness in the event defendant is found guilty in the trial’s first phase, after all of the evidence is presented in that guilt phase of trial.