DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 642 So. 2d 866.

16 citing documents.

  • State v. Hughes 821 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    5 Cir.1993), writ denied, 93-1010 (La.9/30/94), .
  • State v. Davis 768 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    5 Cir. 1993), writ denied, 93-1010 (La.9/30/94), .
  • State v. Flagg 760 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    5 Cir.1993), writ denied, 93-1010 (La.9/30/94), .
  • State v. Jones 757 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    5 Cir.1993), writ denied, 93-1010 (La.9/30/94), .
  • State v. Young 751 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    5 Cir.1993), writ denied, 93-1010 (La.9/30/94), .
  • State v. Gassenberger 750 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    5 Cir.1993), writ denied, 93-1010 (La.9/30/94), .
  • State v. Williams 735 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    5th Cir.1993), writ denied, 93-1010 (La.9/30/94), .
  • State v. Gentras 733 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    5th Cir.1993); writ denied, 93-1010 (La.9/30/94), .
  • State v. Davis 726 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    5 Cir.1993), writ denied, 93-1010 (La.9/30/94), .
  • State v. Ingram 726 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    5 Cir. 1993), writ denied, 93-1010 (La.9/30/94), .
  • State v. Washington 725 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    5th Cir.1993), writ denied, 93-1010 (La.9/30/94), .
  • State v. Washington 725 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    5th Cir.1993), writ denied, 93-1010 (La.9/30/94), .
  • State v. London 720 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    5th Cir.1993), writ denied, 93-1010 (La.9/30/94), .
  • State v. Green 706 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Lassere 683 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    5th Cir.1993), writ denied, 93-1010 (La.9/30/94), .
  • State v. Killian 677 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    9/30/94); , is also very similar to this one: At the time the officers entered defendant's apartment the record reveals that they had information from a CI, who had been in defendant's apartment the day before, that he had seen a quantity of cocaine in the apartment.