Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Constantino v. Old Hickory Casualty Insurance Co., 620 So. 2d 874.

25 citing documents.

State v. Thurman 71 So. 3d 468 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
2d Cir. 1993), writ denied
State v. Nickles 60 So. 3d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
2d Cir.1993), writ denied
State v. Bolden 13 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
2 Cir.1993), writ denied, the appellate court found that the search for a probation violation was not a subterfuge for a criminal investigation where there was no ongoing investigation of the defendant at the time the informant reported a possible probation violation and the search of the residence was conducted by probation officer
State v. Platt 998 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
2d Cir.1993), writ denied, (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Timothy E. Robertson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
2d Cir.), writ denied, the Second Circuit Court of Appeal found that the search for a probation violation was not a subterfuge for a criminal investigation where there was no ongoing investigation of the defendant at the time an informant reported a possible probation violation.
State v. Robertson 988 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
2d Cir.), writ denied, the Second Circuit Court of Appeal found that the search for a probation violation was not a subterfuge for a criminal investigation where there was no ongoing investigation of the defendant at the time an informant reported a possible probation violation.
State v. Perry 900 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
2d Cir.1993), writ denied
State v. Hamilton 845 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
2d Cir.), writ denied, the Second Circuit Court of Appeal found that the search for a probation violation was not a subterfuge for a criminal investigation where there was no ongoing investigation of the defendant at the time an informant reported a possible probation violation.
State v. Drane 828 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
2d Cir.1993), writ denied
State v. Graham 820 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
5th Cir.1992), writ denied, State v. Williams, 98-1006 (La.App.
State v. Bonner 811 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
2d Cir.1993), writ denied, and, most recently, U.S. v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112 , 122 S.Ct.
State v. Vantassel 808 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
2d Cir.1993), writ denied, and, most recently, U.S. v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112 , 122 S.Ct.
State v. Odom 772 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
2d Cir. 1993), writ denied (La.1993), .
State v. Hunter 768 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
2d Cir. 1993), writ denied, (La.
State v. Williams 735 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5th Cir.1992), writ denied, State v. Gibson, supra.
State v. Gibson 708 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5 Cir.1992), writ denied
State v. Downing 710 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
5th Cir.1992), writ denied
State v. Amato 698 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
1st Cir.), writ denied, (1993), cert.
State v. Duran 693 So. 2d 2 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
5 Cir.1992), writ denied
State v. Wesley 685 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
2d Cir.1993), writ denied
State v. Thomas 683 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
2nd Cir.1993) writ denied .
State in Interest of AH 670 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
1 Cir.), writ denied, the court explained: The identity of a defendant as the perpetrator of a crime is one of the elements of the crime that must be proved by the State beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Miskel 668 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
5th Cir.1992), writ denied
State v. Simmons 663 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
5th Cir. 1992), writ denied
State v. Taylor 634 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994