Ingram Corp. v. Cook
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 2d Cir., October 27, 1960 124 So. 2d 190; La., December 15, 1885 37 La. Ann. 900; La., May 15, 1885 37 La. Ann. 417; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 14, 1973 280 So. 2d 400
Ingram Corp. v. Cook, 280 So. 2d 399 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973).
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. The Court, after considering the motion to dismiss this appeal as a suspensive one, has concluded from the record that in essence the mover has raised the question of the sufficiency of the bond to afford a sus-pensive appeal; It is the opinion of this Court that the trial court retains jurisdiction to. consider the sufficiency of a suspensive appeal bond under the provision of Article 2088 of the Civil Code of Procedure; And, therefore, we cannot entertain jurisdiction to determine the sufficiency of the amount of the bond in order for the appeal to qualify as a suspensive one. Motion to dismiss appeal denied.