Meyer v. Weil

*162 On tiie Merits. The note and the contract establish plaintiff’s demand. ' The evidence, under the reconventional demand for remote ami supposititious damages, has failed to satisfy us, as it did the district judge, that, as charged, the plaintiff' had interfered with the defendant’s business by deterring others from dealing with him. The plaintiff in reconvention was projierly non suited. Judgment affirmed with costs.