No. 94-C-0697 Precedential Denied Processed

Skannal v. Skannal

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed May 13, 1994 · 637 So. 2d 1067

Also decided on this docket: La., May 13, 1994 637 So. 2d 1067

Cited by

King v. King 136 So. 3d 941 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
McMullen v. McMullen 82 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Brown v. Brown 31 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Adkins v. Adkins 954 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Jones v. Jones 877 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Alexander v. Alexander 831 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Spomer v. Aggressor Intern., Inc. 807 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Bonnette v. Robles 740 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Cassey v. Stewart 727 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Hiser v. Rajki 700 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Baggett v. Baggett 693 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Caldwell v. Caldwell 672 So. 2d 944 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996

Opinion text

In re Skannal, Nena Grace Gould; — Plaintiffs); applying for Writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Nos. 25467-CA, 26030-CA; Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 84,878. Denied. LEMMON, J., concurs in the denial, but disagrees with respondent’s argument (quoted by the court of appeal) that the uncorroborated testimony of one spouse will never constitute a preponderance of the evidence on the issue of fault. DENNIS, J., not on panel.