Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Blair, 649 So. 2d 382.
-
Carriere v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.
269 So. 3d 1036
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
1/27/95), , which is a completely different case than Davis , .
-
Tasha Tolar Carriere and Daniel Bihm Marcantel v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
1/27/95), which is a completely different case than Davis
-
Bourg v. Cajun Cutters, Inc.
174 So. 3d 56
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 12/7/94) , , writ denied, 95-0034 (La.1/27/95), (no abuse of discretion in allocating 100% of costs to defendant found 40% at fault).
-
Willis v. Ochsner Clinic Foundation
140 So. 3d 338
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 12/7/94), 647 |36So.2d 552, 556, writ denied, 95-0034 (La.1/27/95), .
- Stephen Davis v. State of La, Thru the Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
-
Davis v. State ex rel. DOTD
87 So. 3d 396
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 12/7/94) , , writ denied, 95-0034 (La.1/27/95), .
-
Starr v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation & Development
70 So. 3d 128
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
3d Cir.12/07/94), , writ denied, 95-0034 (La.01/27/95), (wherein DOTD was found to be 40% at fault, but ordered to pay 100% of the court costs).
-
State v. White
996 So. 2d 448
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
1st Cir.10/07/94), , writ denied, 94-2750 (La.01/27/95), .
-
State v. Gibson
907 So. 2d 82
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
1 Cir. 10/7/94) , , writ denied, 94-2749 (La.1/27/95), , the court was asked to determine whether notice to the surety of a judgment of bond forfeiture by certified mail from the district attorney rather than from the clerk of court constituted proper notice to the surety.
-
Kose v. Cablevision of Shreveport
755 So. 2d 1039
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
3d Cir.12/7/94), , writ denied, 95-0034 (La.1/27/95), , $580,000 to a woman with severe and numerous injuries and with permanent disability who was comatose for three weeks and $150,000 to 12-year-old girl with severe leg, knee and hand injuries, who was unable to attend school for the year following the accident; (La.
-
McMahon v. Regional Transit Authority
704 So. 2d 392
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
3 Cir. 12/7/94) , , unit denied 95-0034 (La.1/27/95), ; Hoyt v. State Farm Mut.
- Middlebrooks v. International Indemnity 670 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
-
Bernard v. Lott
666 So. 2d 702
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
1/27/95), ; Hoyt v. State Farm Mut.
- Boutte v. Nissan Motor Corp. 663 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
-
State v. Arceneaux
657 So. 2d 1082
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
1/27/95), , this court was faced with the issue of whether notice to the surety of a judgment of bond *1085 forfeiture by certified mail, return receipt requested, from the District Attorney, rather than from the clerk of court constituted proper notice to the surety under LSA-R.S.