Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fisher, 637 So. 2d 474.

17 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. James D. Flemones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/20/94), where officers who arrested the defendant on drug charges first took him to the emergency room after he had swallowed a large amount of cocaine.
State of Louisiana v. Michael D. Ellis 179 So. 3d 586 La. 2015
1 Cir. 1993) (possession of 20 rocks of cocaine not sufficient to support intent to distribute), writ denied, 94-0226 (La.5/20/94), ; but see State v. White, 98-0091 (La.App.
State v. Lee 964 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
1 Cir.1993), writs denied, 94-0226 and 94-0321 (La.5/20/94), and 476.
State of Louisiana v. Dallas D. Durgan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
5/20/94), the first circuit found that the State failed to eliminate the reasonable hypothesis that the drugs found on Fisher were for personal consumption.
State v. Durgan 931 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
App. 1 Cir.1993), writs denied, 94-226, 94-321 (La.5/20/94), , 476, the first circuit found that the State failed to eliminate the reasonable hypothesis that the drugs found on Fisher were for personal consumption.
State v. Smith 868 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
1st Cir.1993), writs denied, 94-0226 & 94-0321 (La.5/20/94), & .
State v. Holmes 791 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
1 Cir. 1993), writs denied 94-0226 (La.5/20/94), ; 94-0321 (La.5/20/94), , held that evidence of defendant's possession of twenty rocks of crack cocaine was not sufficient to support defendant's conviction for possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute.
State v. Butler 760 So. 2d 322 La. 2000
1st Cir.1993) (possession of 20 rocks of cocaine not sufficient to support an inference of intent to distribute), writ denied, ; (La.App.
State v. Young 764 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
1st Cir.1993), writ denied, 94-0226 and 94-0321 (La.5/20/94), and .
State v. Mamon 743 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
1 Cir.1993), writs denied, 94-0226 (La.5/20/94), and 94-0321 (La.5/20/94), , the First Circuit held that evidence of defendant's possession of approximately twenty rocks of crack cocaine [1] and $688.33 in cash was *772 insufficient to support defendant's conviction for possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute.
State v. Perry 720 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
1st Cir.1993), writs denied, 94-0226 (La.5/20/94), and 94-0321 (La.5/20/94), , in a case similar to the instant one, the First Circuit found that the defendant’s possession of $688.33 in cash and a bag containing twenty rocks of crack cocaine was insufficient to support a conviction for possession with intent to distribute.
Hudson v. Day 703 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
1st Gir.1993), writs denied, 94-0226 (La.5/20/94), & 94-0321 (La.5/20/94), .
State v. Brooks 664 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Jones 657 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Jones 657 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Gordon 646 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Gordon 646 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994