Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Wolfe, 644 So. 2d 648.
-
State v. Gillet
763 So. 2d 725
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4 Cir.1993), writ denied, 94-0448 (La.10/28/94), ; (La.App.
-
State v. Thompson
752 So. 2d 293
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
4th Cir. 1993), writ denied, 94-0448 (La.10/28/94), .
-
State v. Hernandez
735 So. 2d 888
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5 Cir.1993), writ denied, 93-3127 (La.9/16/94), ; reconsideration denied, 93-3127 (La.10/28/94), .
-
State v. Thibodeaux
728 So. 2d 416
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 11/10/93); writs denied, 93-3127 (La.9/16/94); , 93-3127 (La.10/28/94); .
-
State v. Armant
719 So. 2d 510
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5th Cir.1993), writ denied, 93-3127 (La.9/16/94), ; reconsideration denied, 93-3127 (La.10/28/94), ; State v. Billiot, 94-2419 (La.App.
-
State v. Rodriguez
703 So. 2d 803
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
5 Cir.1993), writ denied, 93-3127 (La.9/16/94), , reconsideration denied, 93-3127 (La.10/28/94), .
-
State v. Gaines
701 So. 2d 688
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
10/28/94), , in which this Court held that the failure to object to a Cage v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 39 , 111 S.Ct.
-
State v. Pittman
683 So. 2d 748
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
5th Cir.1993), writ denied, 93-3127 (La.9/16/94), , reconsideration denied, 93-3127 (La.10/28/94), .
-
State v. Thompson
665 So. 2d 686
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
10/28/94), , where the court found proper the refusal to disclose the identity of an informant who, along with a DEA agent, told the defendant that he wanted to buy narcotics.
-
State v. Williams
660 So. 2d 919
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
4th Cir.1993) (holding that Dobson is good law and that defendant is required to object to allegedly defective jury charge at the time it is given), writ denied, 94-0448 (La.10/28/94), .
- State v. Lewis 662 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
- State v. Lennon 661 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
-
State v. Jackson
654 So. 2d 819
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
4th Cir.1993), writ denied, this court succinctly stated the law relative to the disclosure of a confidential informant: "We note that even if the defendant had requested the informant's identity prior to trial, the defendant would not have been entitled to the information.