Martinez v. Bennett
Martinez v. Bennett, 676 So. 2d 241 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. 623 So. 2d 1257
- Reck v. Stevens 373 So. 2d 498
- Rick v. STATE, DOTD 630 So. 2d 1271
Opinion text
CARTER, Judge. We have carefully reviewed the record in this case and conclude that it contains no ground for reversal or modification of the trial court’s judgment. Although the damage awards are generous, we do not find them to, be an abuse of the trial court’s much discretion. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed at appellants’ cost. See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257, 1260-61 (La.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Reck v. Stevens, 373 So.2d 498, 501 (La.1979). See also Rick v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 93-1776 p. 13-14 (La. 1/14/94); 630 So.2d 1271, 1277 . AFFIRMED.