Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Todd v. Sauls, 651 So. 2d 289.

13 citing documents.

LeBlanc v. Landry 21 So. 3d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 12/21/94) , , twits denied, 95-0206, 95-0219 (La.3/24/95), , wherein the third circuit concluded that the trial court gave erroneous competing jury instructions on the standard of care for both the locality standard and the standard of care for a specialist.
James Pickering v. Dr. Dalmacia Paraguya La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Pickering v. PARAGUYA 9 So. 3d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 12/21/94) , , writs denied, 95-206, 95-219 (La.3/24/95), .
Jessie Leary, III v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Leary v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 978 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 12/21/94) , , writs denied, 95-206, 95-219 (La.3/24/95), .
Ernest Broussard, Indiv. v. Medical Protective Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Broussard v. Medical Protective Co. 952 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 12/21/94) , , writs denied, 95-0206, 95-0219 (La.3/24/95), .
Yong Turner v. Southwest Louisiana Hospital Assoc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3/24/95), where the decedent’s surviving spouse and seven adult children shared in wrongful death damages limited to $500,000.00.
Turner v. Southwest Louisiana Hosp. Ass'n 856 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
App. 3 Cir. 12/21/94), , writs denied, 95-206, 95-0219 (La.3/24/95), , where the decedent's surviving spouse and seven adult children shared in wrongful death damages limited to $500,000.00.
Johns v. Agrawal 748 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
3d Cir.12/21/94), -82 , writs denied, 95-0206, 95-0219 (La.3/24/95), ; and Conerly v. State, 97-0871 (La.7/8/98), .
Johnson v. Clark 710 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
3 Cir. 12/21/94); , writs denied, 95-0206, 95-0219 (La.3/24/95); .
Haynes v. Calcasieu Medical Transp., Inc. 702 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
3 Cir. 12/21/94); , writs denied, 95-0206, 95-0219 (La.3/24/95); , discussed jury instructions as follows: Adequate jury instructions fairly and reasonably point out the issues and provide correct principles of law for the jury to apply to those issues.
Hollingsworth v. Bowers 690 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
3/24/95); ; Moody v. United Nat.