Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Nicholes v. Motors Insurance Corp., 680 So. 2d 1165.

422 citing documents.

  • State v. Stevens 766 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/04/96), ; State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Thompson 758 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/04/96), ; State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95), .
  • State v. Fuller 759 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/04/96), .
  • State v. Ruffins 748 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/04/96), .
  • State v. Ruffins 748 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/04/96), .
  • State v. Rose 750 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/04/96), .
  • State v. Bradford 745 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/04/96), ( Jackson standard does not provide the appellate court with a vehicle to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder); State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95)
  • State v. Louis 744 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Caldwell 742 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • Distinguished State v. Hollins 742 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    1st Cir. 4/4/96), , writ granted in part, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), , the State failed to produce testimony that the amount of cocaine seized was inconsistent with personal use.
  • State v. Durham 748 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Thomas 747 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), *614 .
  • State v. Knight 738 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ().
  • State v. Mickens 731 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Adkins 721 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Scott 720 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. MacK 715 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 *129 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Adams 715 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Hubbard 711 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Anderson 706 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Anderson, 29,282 (La.App.2d Cir. 6/18/97), .
  • State v. Anderson 697 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Degruy 689 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    1 Cir. 4/4/96) , , writ granted in part, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), , the appellate court found that where there was no evidence of drug paraphernalia, there were no circumstances indicating that the defendant intended to distribute drugs.