No. 95-CA-1263
Precedential
Processed
Deumite v. State
Also decided on this docket: La., September 1, 1995 659 So. 2d 505
Deumite v. State, 668 So. 2d 727 (La. 1996).
Cited by
- Shelly Benoit v. City of Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- Benoit v. City of Lake Charles 907 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- Deumite v. State 692 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
- Teel v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 681 So. 2d 340 La. 1996
- Rhodes v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 674 So. 2d 239 La. 1996
- Rhodes v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 674 So. 2d 239 La. 1996
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Monteville v. Terrebonne Par. Con. Gov't 567 So. 2d 1097
Opinion text
| ]LEMMON, Justice, concurring. I believe that the State is entitled to the same recreational use immunity as a private citizen under La.Rev.Stat. 9:2791. Monte-ville v. Terrebonne Parish Consol. Gov’t, 567 So.2d 1097 (La.1990) (Marcus, Lemmon & Cole, JJ., concurring). Under that view, the Department does not have to utilize La.Rev. Stat. 9:2795 E in order to be entitled to immunity in this case, if the water bottoms meet the Keelen test. The majority properly refused to reach the constitutional issue.