Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rhodes v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development, 674 So. 2d 239.

27 citing documents.

Daniel Norman v. Michael A. Shelton Enterprise, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Daniel Norman v. Michael A. Shelton Enterprise, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Johnson v. State Through Department of Transportation and Development 275 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Greene v. Succession of Alvarado 210 So. 3d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5/21/96), ; Morris v. State, Department of Transportation., 94-2545 (La.App.
Gardner v. Louisiana Superdome 144 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
& Dev., 95-1848, p. 7 (La.5/21/96), .
Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance 23 So. 3d 259 La. 2009
& Dev., 95-1848 (La.5/21/96), .
Clarkston v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 989 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
& Dev., 95-1848, (La.5/21/96), .
Clarkston v. LA. FARM BUREAU CAS. INS. CO. 989 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
& Dev., 95-1848, (La.5/21/96), .
Franks v. St. Charles Parish Jail 945 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Rhodes v. State, DOTD, 95-1848, p. 7 (La.5/21/96), .
Jordan v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 920 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
1st Cir.5/5/95), , vacated on other grounds, 95-1848 (La.5/21/96), , the Fund argues that, once |Ba final judgment has been rendered, there can be no amended petition because there is no longer a petition before the court to amend.
Petre v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 775 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
& Dev., 95-1848 (La.5/21/96); .
Mier v. Martin 755 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1 Cir. 5/5/95); , vacated in part on other grounds, 95-1848 (La.5/21/96); .
Ditch v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 745 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
See Rhodes v. State, DOTD, 95-CA-1848 (La.5/21/96), ; Campbell v. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), ; Dill v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, Hunter v. Department of Transportation and Development of State of Louisiana, 62
Jenkins v. St. Tammany Parish Police Jury 736 So. 2d 1287 La. 1999
And Dev., 95-1848 (La.5/21/96), , 242.
Jacobs v. City of Bunkie 737 So. 2d 14 La. 1999
and Development, 95-1848, p. 4 (La.5/21/96), .
Brinker v. Junction City Wood Co., Inc. 728 So. 2d 1252 La. 1999
See Rhodes v. State, DOTD, 95-1848 p. 5-6 (La.5/21/96), ; White v. West Carroll Hosp., Inc., Benson & Gold Chevrolet Inc. v. La.
Cazes v. Parish of West Baton Rouge 744 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
And Dev., 95-1848, pp. 6-7 (La.5/21/96); -243 ; Campbell v. Louisiana Dep't of Transp.
Melancon v. City of Lafayette 719 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
and Dev., 95-1848 (La.5/21/96); (quoting Briggs v. Hartford Ins.
Hoolahan v. Munch 719 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
9:2800 was unconstitutional; however, that decision was vacated by the Supreme Court (95-1848 (La.5/21/96), ).
Procell v. Williamette Industries, Inc. 710 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Rhodes v. State, Through Department of Transportation and Development, 95-1848 (La.5/21/96); .
Whigham v. Boyd 700 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
In a case with facts remarkably similar to the facts presented by the instant case, Rhodes v. DOTD, 95-1848 (La.5/21/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court set out the plaintiff's burden of proof, in pertinent part, as follows: To prove negligence under art. 2315 against a thing's owner, plaintiffs must prove that the thing (the traffic signal) created an unreasonable risk of injury that resulted in damage, that DOTD knew or should have know
Wilson v. City of New Orleans 693 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
and Development, 95-1848, (La.5/21/96), .
Todd v. State 685 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
App. 1st Cir.1995) [vacated on other grounds, 95-1848 (La.5/21/96), ].
Maldonado v. Louisiana Superdome Com'n 687 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Rhodes v. State, DOTD, 95-1848, p. 7 (La.5/21/96), .
Rhodes v. State Through DOTD 684 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
[3] Rhodes v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 95-1848 (La.5/21/96), .
Todd v. State ex rel. Department of Social Services, Office of Community Services 685 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
1st Cir.1995) [vacated on other grounds, 95-1848 (La.5/21/96), ], The official cause of death for Joshua is noted in the corner’s report as asphyxia.
Teel v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 681 So. 2d 340 La. 1996
LAW AND DISCUSSION Rhodes v. State, DOTD, 95-1848 (La.5/21/96), , explained that where a trial court finds negligence on the part of DOTD, the court need not resort to strict liability under C.C.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by