No. 95-CA-537 Precedential Processed

Mack v. Imperial Trading Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed November 28, 1995 · 665 So. 2d 536

Cited by

Weller v. Brown 724 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998

Opinion text

DUFRESNE, Judge, concurring with written reasons. Although I agree the matter should be remanded for an evidentiary hearing; I am of the opinion that the plaintiff has not proved any element of his case. He represented himself before the hearing officer and is entitled to a hearing to determine all facets of his case, including the extent of his injury, if any. Accordingly, I concur in remanding for an evidentiary hearing to give this plaintiff his day in court, and hopefully he will obtain an attorney to assist him present his evidence.