Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite GC Services Ltd. Partnership v. Board of Supervisorys, 652 So. 2d 1345.

28 citing documents.

Thomas Handy, Jr. Versus The Parish of Jefferson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Curtis Cheley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Cheley 270 So. 3d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Wood Materials LLC v. City of Harahan 262 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Smith 105 So. 3d 744 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
5th Cir.1993), writ denied, 94-3076 (La.04/07/95), .
State v. Proctor 80 So. 3d 527 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), .
Fleetcor Technologies Operating Co. v. State Ex Rel. Division of Administration, Office of State Purchasing 30 So. 3d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1st Cir.12/22/94), , writ denied, 95-0211 (La.4/7/95), .
State v. Guillard 902 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 11/16/94) , , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), .
State v. Muhammad 857 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), .
State v. Perkins 811 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
5th Cir.11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), .
State v. Morris 798 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5th Cir.11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), ; [12] LSA-C.Cr.P.
State v. Anderson 788 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir. 11/16/94) , , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), .
State v. Mayo 770 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
5 Cir. 11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), , set out the procedure for determining the burden of proof in a multiple offender hearing: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was represented by counsel when the plea was taken.
State v. Dunn 769 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
5 Cir. 11/16/94) , , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), , as follows: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was represented by counsel when the plea was taken.
State v. Breaux 767 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
5th Cir. *912 11/16/94), , writs denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), .
State v. Simmons 767 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
5 Cir. 11/16/94) , , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), , for burdens of proof in habitual offender proceedings: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was repres
State v. Perkins 762 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
5th Cir. 11/16/94), ; writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95)
State v. Ballay 757 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
App. 5 Cir. 11/16/94), -1064 , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), as follows: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was represented by counsel when the plea was taken.
State v. Perkins 751 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
App. 5 Cir. 11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), , for burdens of proof in habitual offender proceedings: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was repres
State v. Jordon 732 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
App. 5th Cir.11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), as follows: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was represented by counsel when the plea was taken.
State v. Richmond 734 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
App. 5th Cir. 11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), .
State v. Richmond 734 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
App. 5th Cir. 11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), .
State v. Williams 729 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5th Cir. 11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), as follows: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was represented by counsel when the plea was taken.
State v. DeSalvo 721 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5 Cir.1994), writs denied at which states at page 1064: “If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was represented by counsel when the plea was taken.
State v. Carter 712 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
App. 5 Cir. 11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), , [4] , this Court summarized the burdens of proof during a multiple offender proceeding as follows: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was r
State v. Windham 712 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 11/16/94), , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), this court noted the following where the predicate conviction is obtained pursuant to a plea of guilty: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was represented by counsel when the plea was taken.
State v. Scamardo 708 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 11/16/94) , , writ denied, 94-3076 (La.4/7/95), , as follows: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was represented by counsel when the plea was taken.
State v. Winfrey 703 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
4/7/95), as follows: If the defendant denies the multiple offender allegations then the burden is on the State to prove (1) the existence of a prior guilty plea, and (2) that defendant was represented by counsel when the plea was taken.