DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Conner, 655 So. 2d 340.

40 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. David W. Lupton, III La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
    6/16/95), State v. Dewhirst, 527 So.
  • State v. Free 127 So. 3d 956 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Walters, 25,587 (La.App.2d Cir [1/19/94),⅝, , writ denied, 95-0422 (La.6/16/95), ; State v. Oden-baugh, 2010-0268 (La.12/6/11), , cert, denied, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct.
  • State v. Alexander 111 So. 3d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    1st Cir.10/7/94), , writ denied, 95-0420 (La.6/16/95), .
  • State v. Harry 11 So. 3d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Lofton 992 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    6/16/95), (citing State v. Martin, 356 So.
  • State of Louisiana v. Archie Louis Carter, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    6/16/95), the defendant was convicted of possession of over 400 grams of cocaine and conspiracy to distribute cocaine.
  • State v. Carter 981 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    1 Cir. 10/7/94) , , writ denied, 95-420 (La.6/16/95), , the defendant was convicted of possession of over 400 grams of cocaine and conspiracy to distribute cocaine.
  • State v. Foster 962 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    App. 2d Cir.12/7/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.6/16/95), .
  • State v. Hill 961 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    App.2d Cir.12/07/94), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.06/16/95), .
  • State v. Batton 920 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    App.2d Cir.12/07/94), , unit denied, 95-0431 (La.06/16/95), .
  • State v. Burford 907 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    2d Cir.12/07/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.06/16/95), .
  • State v. Mims 907 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    1 Cir. 10/7/94), , rehearing denied, 01/18/95, writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/16/95), , in which the defendant's objection to hearsay testimony concerning out-of-court statements of a co-defendant was held sufficient to preserve for appellate review the claim that such testimony violated the defendant's rights of cross-examination and confrontation.
  • State v. White 867 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    P. art. 881.2(A)(2); State v. Young, 96-0195 (La.10/15/96), ; State v. Rice, 26,478 (La.App.2d Cir.12/07/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.06/16/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Willis 868 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    P. art. 881.2(A)(2); State v. Young, 96-0195 (La.10/15/96), ; State v. Rice, 26,478 (La.App.2d Cir.12/7/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.6/16/95), .
  • State v. Adger 803 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    2 Cir. 12/7/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.6/16/95), .
  • State v. Hall 794 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See State v. Rice, 26,478 (La.App.2d Cir.12/7/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.6/16/95), , and State v. Hill, 30,182 (La.App.2d Cir.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Lowery 781 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Colomb, 98-2813 (La.10/1/99), ; State v. Walters, 25,587 (La.App.2d Cir.1/19/94), , appeal after remand, 26,647 (La.App.2d Cir.12/7/94), , writ denied, 95-0422 (La.6/16/95), ; State v. Scott, 31,379 (La.
  • State v. Hearold 777 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Young, 96-0195 (La.10/15/96), ; State v. Garza, 32,948 (La.App.2d Cir.03/01/00), ; State v. Rice, 26,478 (La.App.2d Cir.12/07/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.06/16/95), .
  • State v. Sepulvado 756 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    art. 881.2(A)(2); State v. Young, 96-0195 (La.10/15/96), ; State v. Rice, 26,478 (La.App.2d Cir.12/07/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.06/16/95), .
  • State v. Garza 756 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Young, 96-0195 (La.10/15/96), ; State v. Rice, 26,478 (La.App.2d Cir.12/7/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.6/16/95), .
  • State v. Sanchez 749 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    endant cannot appeal or seek review of a sentence imposed in conformity with a plea agreement which was set forth in the record at the time of the plea.” This provision applies both to agreed sentences and to agreed ceilings, “ranges” or “caps.” State v. Young, 96-0195 (La.10/15/96), ; State v. Rice, 26,478 (La.App.2d Cir.12/7/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.6/16/95), .
  • State v. Moore 743 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    App.2d Cir.12/07/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.06/16/95), .
  • State v. McLaurin 743 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    This provision applies both to agreed sentences and to agreed ceilings, “ranges” or “caps.” State v. Young, 96-0195 (La.10/15/96), ; State v. Bradley, 30,672 (La.App.2d Cir.05/13/98), ; State v. Rice, 26,478 (La.App.2d Cir.12/07/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.06/16/95), .
  • State v. Walker 747 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    App. 2nd Cir. 12/7/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.6/16/95), .
  • State v. Shipp 754 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    In State v. Rice, 26,478 (La.App.2d Cir.12/7/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.6/16/95), , the second circuit concluded a plea bargain providing for a sentencing cap and a reservation of appellate review of any sentence imposed was contrary to article 881 .2(A)(2) and absolutely null, because if enforced, the plea bargain would produce a result prohibited by law and violate a rule of public order.
  • State v. Harris 739 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    1st Cir.10/7/94), , writ denied, 95-0420 (La.6/16/95), (citing Chapman v. California, *318 386 U.S. 18, 23 , 87 S.Ct.
  • State v. Oliver 741 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    2 Cir. 12/7/94), , unit denied 95-0431 (La.6/16/95), .
  • State v. Rankin 741 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    art. 881.2(A)(2); State v. Young, 96-0195 (La.10/15/96), ; State v. Rice, 26,478 (La.App.2d Cir.12/7/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.6/16/95), .
  • State v. Franklin 714 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Young, 96-0195 (La.10/15/96), ; State v. Rice, 26,478 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/7/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.6/16/95), .
  • State v. Bradley 714 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Young, 96-0195 (La.10/15/96), ; State v. Rice, 26,478 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/7/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.6/16/95), .
  • State v. Hill 704 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    Although the court allowed the proviso and the state acquiesced, appellate review of the sentence would contradict the principle enunciated in State v. Rice, 26,478 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/07/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.06/16/95), .
  • State v. Cormier 702 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    1 Cir. 10/7/94) ; , writ denied, 95-0420 (La.6/16/95); , the defendant was sentenced to twenty-seven years for 1000 grams | i3of cocaine in possession; in State v. Colarte, 96-0670 (La.App.
  • State v. Brown 702 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    App.2d Cir. 01/19/94), , writ denied 95-0422 (La.06/16/95), , *751 this court expressly held that no contemporaneous objection was required to evidence which the defendant had unsuccessfully sought to have excluded by a motion in limine.
  • State v. Jonas 698 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    State v. Young, 96-0195 (La.10/15/96), ; State v. Rice, 26,478 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/7/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.6/16/95), .
  • State v. Planco 692 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    2 Cir. 12/7/94); , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.6/16/95); , the defendant was charged with second degree murder, but pled guilty to manslaughter in response to a plea bargain.
  • State v. Johnson 687 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    2 Cir. 12/7/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.6/16/95), , the second circuit, faced with a similar issue, had this to say: A plea bargain with a cap, reserving the right to appeal is contrary to specific statutory law.
  • State v. Young 680 So. 2d 1171 La. 1996
    2d Cir. 1993) (per curiam); State v. Hodge, 25,574 (La.App.2d Cir. 2/23/94), ; State v. Rice, 26,478 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/7/94), , writ denied, 95-0431 (La.6/16/95), .
  • State v. Caldwell 679 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Crawford 672 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Scott 669 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    06/16/95), , defendant argues that the trial court erred in considering cruelty as an aggravating factor in a manslaughter case.