DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hines, 667 So. 2d 528.

20 citing documents.

  • Malancon v. Ace Transportation, LLC 153 So. 3d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3d Cir.10/4/95), -91 , writ denied, 95-2679 (La.2/9/96), ; (2) deducted from the gross receipts the rental value of the equipment and related expenses incurred by the worker, see Herrin v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Company, (La.App.
  • State v. Price 780 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    App. 3 Cir. 10/4/95), , writ denied, 95-2686 (La.2/6/96), ( ).
  • State v. Hopkins 774 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    (La.1984); State v. Baum, 95-0384 (La.App.3d Cir.10/4/95), , writ denied, 95-2685 (La.2/9/96), .
  • State v. Guzman 769 So. 2d 1158 La. 2000
    3 Cir. 10/4/95) , , writ denied, 95-2685 (La.2/9/96), .
  • State v. Phillips 762 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    3d Cir.10/4/95), , writ denied, 95-2685 (La.2/9/96), .
  • State v. White 756 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    3rd Cir.10/4/95), , writ denied, 95-2685 (La.2/9/96), .
  • State v. Texada 756 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 10/4/95) ; , writ denied, 95-2686 (La.2/9/96); .
  • State v. King 757 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 10/4/95) ; , writ denied, 95-2686 (La.2/6/96); .
  • State v. Johnson 750 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    3rd Cir.10/4/95), , writ denied, 95-2685 (La.2/9/96), .
  • State v. Carthan 765 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 10/4/95) ; , writ denied, 95-2686 (La.2/9/96); ().
  • State v. Dean 748 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 10/4/95) ; , writ denied, 95-2686 (La.2/6/96)
  • State v. Francis 748 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 10/4/95) ; , writ denied, 95-2686 (La.2/9/96); .
  • State v. Anderson 732 So. 2d 517 La. 1999
    3d Cir. 10/4/95), , writ denied, 95-2685 (La.2/9/96), .
  • State v. McDowell 720 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    3 Cir. 10/4/95) ; , 201 writ denied, 95-2686 (La.2/9/96)
  • State v. King 720 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    3 Cir. 10/4/95); , writ denied, 95-2686 (La.2/6/96); , (La.App.
  • State v. Hill 714 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    3d Cir. 10/04/95), , writ denied, 95-2685 (La.02/09/96), .
  • State v. Amos 714 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    8 Cir. 10/4/95); , writ denied, 95-2686 (La.2/6/96); , and resolved as follows: [W]hen a defendant alone appeals and the record contains a patent error favorable to the defendant, the appellate court should ignore the error, unless the prosecution, having properly raised the issue in the trial court, has sought the appel
  • State v. Newman 707 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    3 Cir. 10/4/95) , , writ denied, 95-2685 (La.2/9/96), .
  • State v. Recard 704 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    3 Cir. 10/4/95); , writ denied, 95-2686 (La.2/9/96); , (La.App.
  • State v. Cormier 702 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    3 Cir. 10/4/95) ; , writ denied, 95-2686 (La.2/9/96); , this court ruled that a similar problem was less relevant where other factors were present to support the sentence; accordingly, the precise question was not answered.