No. 95-KD-1282
Precedential
Processed
State v. Dorsey
State v. Dorsey, 654 So. 2d 1094 (La. 1995).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Neslo 433 So. 2d 73
Opinion text
In re Dorsey, Gregory; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 317-520. Denied. Defendant does not set forth any grounds on which a motion to quash may be sustained. Insofar as the defendant is prejudiced by the state’s amendment of the indictment, his remedy is to seek a continuance of the trial of this matter. C.Cr.P. 488, 489; State v. Neslo, 433 So.2d 73, 81 (La.1983). WATSON and VICTORY, JJ., denied without reasons. KIMBALL, J., not on panel.