No. 96-C-150 Precedential Processed

Martin v. State Farm Insurance

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed February 12, 1997 · 690 So. 2d 114

Cited by

Doe v. University Healthcare Systems, L.L.C. 145 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Marshall Ex Rel. Minor Chil. v. Air Liquide-Big Three, Inc. 2 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Crooks v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc. 994 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Display South, Inc. v. GRAPHICS HOUSE SPORTS PRO., INC. 992 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Faith Brooks v. Union Pacific Railroad Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Brooks v. UNION PACIFIC RR CO. 985 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Sutton Steel & Supply v. Bellsouth Mobility 971 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Sutton Steel & Supply, Inc. v. Bellsouth Mobility, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Gudo v. Administrators of Tulane Educ. Fund 966 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Ford Motor Co. 965 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Oubre v. Louisiana Citizens Fair Plan 961 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Display South v. Express Computer Supply 961 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007

all 26 citing documents »

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Payne v. Pedus Building Service Inc. 671 So. 2d 13

Opinion text

On March 13, 1996, this Court denied relator’s writ and we, in effect, agreed with the trial court that the Exception of Prescription was inappropriate. Thereafter, the relator applied for Supervisory and Remedial Writs to the Louisiana Supreme Court, which granted writs on May 17,1996 and remanded it to us “for full briefing, argument and opinion.” Upon review, we find the trial court’s judgment dated February 3, 1996 to be contrary to law and, therefore, reverse the action of the trial court and do hereby grant the relator’s Exception of Prescription. See Payne v. Pedus Bldg. Serv., Inc., 95-877 (La.App. 5th Cir. 2/14/96), 671 So.2d 13 . WRIT OF REVIEW GRANTED.