Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Bilyeu, 686 So. 2d 862.

16 citing documents.

  • Succession of Stephen J. Dibeneditto La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
  • In re Ivey 238 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    1/24/97), , the court held that an incorrect reference to the testator, who was a man, as "she" and "her" in the attestation clause was a typographical error that did not nullify the will.
  • Succession of Elmoses Ivey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    1/24/97), the court held that an incorrect reference to the testator, who was a man, as “she” and “her” in the attestation clause was a typographical error that did not nullify the will.
  • In Re Succession of Dodson 867 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Robertson v. Cubine, 31,743 (La.App.2d Cir.03/31/99), , citing, Succession of Bilyeu, 28,701 (La.App.2d Cir.09/25/96), , writ denied, 96-2868 (La.01/24/97), .
  • Succession of Cooper 830 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Mack v. Evans, 35,364 (La.App.2d Cir.12/05/01), , writ denied, 2002-0422 (La.04/19/02), ; In re Succession of Poland, 34,291 (La.App.2d Cir.04/04/01), , citing, Succession of Bilyeu, 28,701 (La.App.2d Cir.09/25/96), , writ denied, 96-2868 (La.01/24/97), .
  • Williams v. State ex rel. Department of Social Services 813 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    3rd Cir.5/8/96), , unit denied, 96-2867 (La.1/24/97), ; and Ab-shire v. State of Louisiana, through Dept. of Insurance, 93-923 (La.App.
  • Williams v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF SS 813 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    3rd Cir.5/8/96), , writ denied, 96-2867 (La.1/24/97), ; and Abshire v. State of Louisiana, through Dept. of Insurance, 93-923 (La.App.
  • MacK v. Evans 804 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    2d Cir.09/25/96), , writ denied, 96-2868 (La.01/24/97), .
  • In Re Succession of Poland 784 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    2nd Cir.9/25/96), , writ denied, 96-2868 (La.1/24/97), .
  • In Re Succession of Slay 764 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    2 Cir. 9/25/96); , writ denied, 96-2868 (La.1/24/97); .
  • Jameson v. Nugent 764 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    2 Cir. 9/25/96); , writ denied, 96-2868 (La.1/24/97); .
  • Succession of Gates 746 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Succession of Bilyeu, 28,701 (La.App.2d Cir.9/25/96), , writ denied, 96-2868 (La.1/24/97), .
  • AEB v. JBE 741 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    requiring clear and convincing evidence is more than a “preponderance of the evidence” and less than “beyond a reasonable doubt.” To establish a fact by clear and convincing evidence, the | existence of the disputed fact must be highly probable; i.e., much more probable than its non-existence, Succession of Bilyeu, 28,701 (La.App.2d Cir.9/25/96), , writ denied, 96-2868 (La.1/24/97), .
  • Ricard v. Smith 736 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 5/8/96) , 690 |sSo.2d 57, writ denied, 96-2867 (La.1/24/97), ; (La.App.
  • Robertson v. Cubine 731 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    App.2d Cir.9/25/96), , unit denied, 96-2868 (La.1/24/97), .
  • Brown v. Hobson 706 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    In Succession of Bilyeau, 28,701 (La.App.9/25/96), , writ denied 96-2868 (La.1/24/97), , where an attestation clause in a will was attacked for technical deviations, this court held that those deviations did not invalidate the dispositive portions of an otherwise valid will.