In re Mary Belsom Welsh Qualified Trust
Also decided on this docket: La., November 7, 1997 703 So. 2d 1257; La., September 26, 1997 701 So. 2d 970
In re Mary Belsom Welsh Qualified Trust, 696 So. 2d 549 (La. 1997).
Cited by
- Advanced Benefit Concepts, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Access Health, … La. 2024
- Advanced Benefit Concepts, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Access Health, … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
- Advanced Benefit Concepts, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Access Health, … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
- Duplantis v. Louisiana Bd. of Ethics 782 So. 2d 582 La. 2001
- In re Mary Belsom Welsh Qualified Trust 733 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
- Jones v. BD. OF ETHICS FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS 709 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Matter of Succession of Dunham 408 So. 2d 888
- Albritton v. Albritton 622 So. 2d 709
Opinion text
JiPER CURIAM * Writ granted. The judgments of the lower courts are vacated and set aside. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings. The presence of dissension between the trustee and beneficiaries, or mere animosity or hostility alone, without a showing of material impairment or interference with proper trust administration, does not rise to the level of “sufficient cause” that would prompt the trustee’s removal under La.R.S. 9:1789. Succession of Dunham, 408 So.2d 888, 900 (La.1981); see also Albritton v. Albritton, 622 So.2d 709 (La.App. 1st Cir.1993). CALOGERO, C.J., and LEMMON, J., would grant and docket. VICTORY, J., would deny the writ. Knoll, J., not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.