State ex rel. Magee v. State
Also decided on this docket: La., May 15, 1998 719 So. 2d 63
State ex rel. Magee v. State, 692 So. 2d 408 (La. 1997).
Cited by
Distinguished in 1
- Louis Guillory v. City of Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
- Guillory v. City of Lake Charles 157 So. 3d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- Zimko v. American Cyanamid 905 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
- Cole v. Department of Public Safety 825 So. 2d 1134 La. 2002
- Keller v. Evans Cooperage, Inc. 771 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- Abney v. Exxon Corp. 755 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
- Reeves v. Structural Preservation Systems 731 So. 2d 208 La. 1999
- Gordon v. Occidental Chemical Corp. 709 So. 2d 689 La. 1998
Opinion text
In re Magee, Ruchell Cinque; — Plaintiffis); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 10-755. Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to vacate judgment he filed on or about December 4, 1996. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment. JOHNSON, J., not on panel.