Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Francis, 704 So. 2d 1196.

13 citing documents.

Krystyn Landry Versus National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburg, Ceva Logistics U.S., Inc. and Jeremiah Ethan Rodney La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
12/12/97), and writ denied, 97-2031 (La.
Oleszkowicz v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 129 So. 3d 1272 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 6/30/97) ; , writs denied, 97-2030, 97-2031, 97-2032, 97-2034 (La.12/12/97); and .
Bonnie Romero v. Clarendon America Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Craig Steven Arabie v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Arabie v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 49 So. 3d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 6/30/97), , writs denied, 97-2030, 97-2031, 97-2032, 97-2034 (La.12/12/97), , 1197.
Howard v. Union Carbide Corp. 897 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 6/30/97) , , writs denied, XX-XXXX-XXXX (La.12/12/97), -97.
Davis v. American Home Products Corp. 844 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 6/30/97) , , writs denied, 97-2030, 2031, 2032 & 2034 (La.12/12/97), & 1197, the Louisiana Fifth Circuit affirmed certification of negligence class actions against a company and contractor, arising from the release of natural gas from a pipeline system.
Bujol v. Entergy Services, Inc. 833 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 6/30/97), , writs denied, 97-2030, 97-2031, 97-2032, 97-2034 (La.12/12/97), -1197, wherein the court concluded an agent's negligence can be imputed to its principal.
Mosing v. Domas 830 So. 2d 967 La. 2002
5 Cir. 6/30/97) , , writ denied, 97-2030, 97-2031, 97-2032, 97-2034 (La.12/12/97), , 1197, citing Billiot v. B.P.
Ross v. Conoco, Inc. 805 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
12/12/97); , 97-2031 (La.12/12/97); .
Corbello v. Iowa Production 806 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
5 Cir. 6/30/97) ; , writs denied, 97-2030 (La.12/12/97); and 97-2031, 2032, 2034 (La.12/12/97); , and State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, 97-1862 (La.App.
Mosing v. Domas 798 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
5 Cir. 6/30/97); , writ denied, 97-2030, 97-2031 (La.12/12/97); , 1197 (citation omitted), the court explained the purpose of punitive damages: While the purpose of ordinary damages is to compensate the victim, the purpose of punitive damages is to punish and deter wrongdoers.
Dumas v. Angus Chemical Co. 728 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
5th Cir. 6/30/97), , writs denied 97-2030 (La.12/12/97), and 97-2031, 97-2032, 97-2034 (La.12/12/97), .