No. 97-KH-2147
Precedential
Processed
State v. Van Winkle
State v. Van Winkle, 699 So. 2d 77 (La. 1997).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Melon 660 So. 2d 466
- State v. Schexnayder 685 So. 2d 357
Opinion text
In re Van Winkle, Patricia; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial wilts; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “O”, No. 91-3400. Writ granted. The court of appeal is ordered to accept and consider relator’s pro se filing. State v. Melon, 95-2209 (La. 9/22/95), 660 So.2d 466 (“the meaningful access to courts guaranteed by La. Const. art. I, Sections 2, 19 and 22 requires courts to accept and consider post-verdict pro se filings”); see also State v. Schexnayder, 96-0098, p. 24 (La.App. 5th Cir. 11/26/96), 685 So.2d 357, 371 . VICTORY, J., not on panel.