DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Bivins, 696 So. 2d 551.

675 citing documents.

  • Lopez v. Home Furnishing Store 772 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Caparotti v. Shreveport Pirates Football Club 768 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc.. 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Braud v. First Nat. Bank of Gonzales 763 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Matthews v. VIP International, Inc. 762 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 8 (La.7/1/97), ().
  • Wiltz v. Baudin's Sausage Kitchen 763 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    The minimum standard the employer must comply with to establish his burden of proving job availability outlined by the Supreme Court in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97); is not all that is required in a substantial pain case.
  • Turner v. Sunbelt Mfg. 763 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Bolton v. Tulane University 755 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), p.8-9, , our Supreme Court summarized the rules regarding supplemental earnings benefits as follows: "The purpose of SEBs is to compensate the injured employee for the wage earning capacity he has lost as a result of his accident."
  • Collins v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. 760 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Anthony v. BE & K CONST. 760 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Odom v. International Paper Company, 31,826 (La.App.2d Cir.5/5/99), .
  • Baker v. Libbey Glass, Inc. 759 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Pace v. City of New Orleans 761 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections, 93-1305 (La.2/28/94), ; Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530, (La.1/14/94), .
  • Perkins v. Entergy Corp. 756 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Parker v. Nabors Drilling, USA 756 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    23:1021(10)(d) with respect to the per diem.” [ ¿‘Factual findings in a workers’ compensation case are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.” Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97); .
  • Gracianette v. Emeril's Restaurant 761 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections, 93-1305 (La.2/28/94), ; Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530, (La.1/14/94), .
  • Capitol Nursing Home, Inc. v. Nixon 764 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 8 (La.7/1/97)
  • JE Merit Constructors, Inc. v. Hickman 758 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7-8 (La.7/1/97); .
  • Haws v. Professional Sewer Rehabilitation, Inc. 763 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Banks v. Industrial *688 Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Baker Hughes, Inc. v. Ardoin 758 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    In Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), , the supreme court stated the following: In applying the manifest error-clearly wrong standard, the appellate court must determine not whether the trier of fact was right or wrong, but whether the factfinder's conclusion was a reasonable one.
  • Kelley v. Jack Jackson Const. Co. 748 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Oliveaux v. Riverside Nursing Home, 29,419 (La.
  • Demeritt v. Trahan 755 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840, p. 7-8 (La.7/1/97); .
  • East-Garrett v. Greyhound Bus Lines 746 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    23:1221(3)(a); Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97); .
  • Taylor v. Columbian Chemicals 744 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Gilley v. Reeves Deli Mart, 30,355 (La.App.
  • Manpower Temporary Services v. Lemoine 747 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97); .
  • McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc. 743 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    See, *833 Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Page v. Page 762 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Holloway v. Hilton Hotels Corp. 743 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 4 (La.12/2/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works , 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), ; Smith v. Louisiana Dep’t of Corrections, 93-1305, p. 4 (La.2/28/94), ; Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530, pp. 4-5 (La.1/14/94), -738 .
  • Bertsch v. South Gateway Tire 738 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc. 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Leeman v. Triple E Transport, Inc. 744 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    See Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Oubre v. Jacobs Engineering Group 739 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    [6] Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840, pp. 8-9 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Perot v. Link Staffing Services 744 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal, 96-2840 (La.7/1/97); .
  • Crotwell v. Holloway Sportswear 740 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Seal v. Gaylord Container Corporation, supra ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Gray v. Premier Staffing 736 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    “Where there are two permissible views of the evidence, a factfinder’s choice between them can never be manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.” Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 8 (La.7/1/97); .
  • Ricaud v. Holloway Sportswear, Inc. 741 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.1997); .
  • Cajun Forge Co., Inc. v. Spell 734 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    App. 3 Cir. 10/14/98); ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97); ; (La.App.
  • Gourley v. Prudential Property Ins. 734 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 8 (La.7/1/96); .
  • Odom v. International Paper Co. 736 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.07/01/97), ; Smith v. Louisiana Dep't of Corrections, 93-1305 (La.02/28/94), .
  • Peloquin v. Eunice News 737 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97); .
  • Wiley v. Grand Casino Avoyelles 731 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    23:1221(3)(c)(i); Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97); .
  • Winfrey v. Donna 751 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • Bennett v. Rodeway Inn 734 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Once the claimant bears his burden, an employer has the burden of proving job availability, however, such burden may be relieved by a showing that the jobs offered are suitable and “within the claimant’s physical capabilities and within claimant’s or the employer’s community or reasonable geographic region.” Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Joffrion v. Bryant 732 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    See Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97); ; See also Cajun Bag & Supply v. Baptiste, 94-1218 (La.
  • Jackson v. Domtar Industries, Inc. 732 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 9 (La.7/1/97); , we find that Defendant properly reduced Plaintiff's SEB payments.
  • Bolton v. Grant Parish School Bd. 730 So. 2d 882 La. 1999
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Collins v. General Motors Corp. 736 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840 (La.07/07/97), ; Alexander v. Pellerin Marble & Granite, 93-1698 (La.01/14/94), ; Hymes v. Monroe Mack Sales, 28,768 (La.App.2d Cir.10/30/96), .
  • Bergeron v. Watkins 731 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97)
  • First Baptist Church of Lake Arthur v. Fontenot 736 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    After the employee established this initial burden, the burden shifted to the employer to establish, at a minimum, the following by competent evidence as explained by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 10-11 (La.7/1/97); , 557: (1) the existence of a suitable job within claimant’s physical capabilities and within claimant’s or the employer’s community or reasonable geographic region; (2) the amount of wages that an employee with
  • Clifton v. Ditto's Apparel 736 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97); .
  • Parfait v. Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. 733 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Nelson v. City of Grambling 722 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Hagan v. LSU Medical Center, 28,669 (La.App.2d Cir.9/27/96), .
  • Dubois v. Louisiana Forest Industries 722 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97); .