Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Bivins, 696 So. 2d 551.

675 citing documents.

  • Judy Davis v. Louisiana Dept. of Transportation & Development La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97)
  • Davis v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation & Development, Office of Risk Management 27 So. 3d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97) .
  • Harrell v. St. Margaret's Daughter's Nursing Home 24 So. 3d 941 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.07/01/97), .
  • Battiste v. Dolgencorp 29 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Riker v. POPEYE'S FRIED CHICKEN 29 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Peters v. GREYHOUND BUS LINES, INC. 22 So. 3d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • White v. COUNTY MARKET 24 So. 3d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    1 Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Smith v. Louisiana Dep’t of Corrections, 93-1305 (La.2/28/94), .
  • Viel Olivier v. Olivier Builders La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    7/1/97), Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530 (La.
  • Olivier v. Olivier Builders 19 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530 (La.1/14/94), ; Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
  • Thonn v. Slidell Memorial Hospital 20 So. 3d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    However, the judge found that SMH carried its burden to defeat Ms. Thonn’s claim for supplemental earnings benefits (SEB) and identified several jobs pursuant to the criteria set forth in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Read v. PEL-STATE OIL CO. 13 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 *1196 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Alley v. PERINI/O & G INDUSTRIES 12 So. 3d 427 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 1996-2840 (La.07/01/97), .
  • Alexander v. Sanderson Farms, Inc. 17 So. 3d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    5 See also Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 9 (La.1997), (holding, that in order to defeat the employee’s claim for supplemental earnings benefits or establish the employee’s earning capacity, an employer must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the employee is physically able to perform a certain job and that the job was offered to the employee or that the
  • Marvin Arnaud v. Shaw Construction La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    7/1/97), (citations omitted): 1 Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:1208.1 concerns the right of an employer to inquire into an employee’s previous injury claims and the forfeiture of benefits for an employee’s failure to truthfully answer such inquiry.
  • Arnaud v. Shaw Construction 12 So. 3d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    DISCUSSION The Louisiana Supreme Court set out the standard of review to be employed in workers’ compensation cases in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), (citations omitted): | ¡¡Factual findings in workers’ compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • Ledford v. New Orleans Saints 10 So. 3d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Daigle v. McGee Backhoe and Dozer Service 16 So. 3d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97); .
  • Dodd v. Merit Electrical, Inc. 8 So. 3d 849 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Michael W. Trahan v. City of Crowley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    On the issue of the reduction in SEB, the WCJ found that the reduction implemented as a result of the job offer was improper since the part-time job did not constitute a suitable job, and the offer of employment was not in keeping with the dictates of Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97)
  • Kim Williams v. Averitt Express, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97)
  • Trahan v. City of Crowley 7 So. 3d 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    On the issue of the reduction in SEB, the WCJ found that the reduction implemented as a result of the job offer was improper since the part-time job did not constitute a suitable job, and the offer of employment was not in keeping with the dictates of Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Williams v. Averitt Express, Inc. 7 So. 3d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Moses v. Terrebonne General Medical Center 9 So. 3d 987 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Priscilla Ebare v. Cubic Applications, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    7/1/97), (citations omitted): 2 Factual findings in workers’ compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • Pamela Merriett v. Budget Build Lumber & Supply, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    7/1/97), (citations omitted): Factual findings in workers’ compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • Ebare v. Cubic Applications, Inc. 5 So. 3d 1028 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    DISCUSSION The Louisiana Supreme Court set out the standard of review to be employed in workers’ compensation cases in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), (citations omitted): |,sFactual findings in workers’ compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • Merriett v. Budget Build Lumber & Supply, Inc. 6 So. 3d 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    DISCUSSION The Louisiana Supreme Court set out the standard of review to be employed in workers’ compensation cases in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), (citations omitted): Factual findings in workers’ compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • Johnette Wilczewski v. Brookshire Grocery Store La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Wilczewski v. Brookshire Grocery Store 2 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    The applicable standard of review for a | ¿finding of fact, that of manifest error, is set out in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Johnson v. Bossier Parish School Board 3 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Johnson v. City of New Orleans Police Department 4 So. 3d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Accord Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, (La.7/1/97), .
  • Cortez v. East Jefferson General Hospital 7 So. 3d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Lemoine v. Town of Simmesport 998 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    DISCUSSION The Louisiana Supreme Court set out the standard of review to be employed in workers' compensation cases in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), (citations omitted): Factual findings in workers' compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • Janet C. Lemoine v. Town of Simmesport La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    7/1/97), (citations omitted): Factual findings in workers’ compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • Russell v. Regency Hosp. of Covington, LLC 998 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Portalis v. OUR LADY OF LOURDES REG. MEDIC. 984 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    In Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 7-8 (La.7/1/97), (citations omitted) (alteration in original), the supreme court set forth the standard of review in workers' compensation cases: Factual findings in workers' compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • Wilton C. Portalis, Jr. v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    7/1/97), (citations omitted) (alteration in original), the supreme court set forth the standard of review in workers’ compensation cases: Factual findings in workers’ compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • Jones v. City of Baton Rouge 991 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Montanez v. BAYOU INSULATION & GARAGE DOORS 991 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Stewart v. Livingston Parish School Bd. 991 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530 (La.1/14/94), ; Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
  • Morris v. RENT-A-CENTER, INC. 981 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    App. 2 Cir. 12/30/99), , citing, Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.07/01/97), ; Oliveaux v. Riverside Nursing Home, 29,419 (La.App.
  • Mike Stoute v. Petroleum Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Stoute v. Petroleum Center 980 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), , 556.
  • Brien v. Leon Angel Constructors, Inc. 978 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Terral v. JUSTISS OIL CO. INC. 979 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    in order to defeat his SEB claim, Justiss Oil was required to "prove that the employee is physically able to perform a certain job and that the job was offered or available to the employee in his community or reasonable geographic region" and Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Marion Thomas Terral, Jr. v. Justiss Oil Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Lemons v. Georgia Pacific Corp. 976 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Pierre v. Tulane University 984 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), ; Chatters v. Dorignac's Food Center, 00-0477 (La.App.
  • Freeman v. Chase 974 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), ; Caparotti v. Shreveport Pirates Football Club, 33,570 (La.App.
  • Jones v. Hollywood Casino Shreveport 972 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 1996-2840 (La.07/01/97), ; Nelson v. City of Grambling, 31,303 (La.App.2d Cir.12/09/98), , writ denied XXXX-XXXX (La.02/26/99), .