Michler ex rel. Michler v. Hamilton ex rel. Hamilton
Also decided on this docket: La., February 5, 1999 737 So. 2d 733
Michler ex rel. Michler v. Hamilton ex rel. Hamilton, 745 So. 2d 1175 (La. 1999).
The holding in the court’s own words
After hearing oral arguments and reviewing the record in this case, we conclude that the judgment below does not require the exercise of our supervisory authority.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Brasseaux v. Town of Mamou 737 So. 2d 733
Opinion text
PER CURIAM * Upon defendant’s application, we granted certiorari in this case. 98-3003 (La.2/5/99), 737 So.2d 733 . After hearing oral arguments and reviewing the record in this case, we conclude that the judgment below does not require the exercise of our supervisory authority. Accordingly, we recall our order of February 5, 1999 as improvidently granted, and deny defendant’s application. KNOLL, J., dissents. TRAYLOR and VICTORY, JJ., dissent from the recall of this writ. Kimball, J. not on panel. Rule IV, Part II, § 3.