State v. Moore
State v. Moore, 719 So. 2d 59 (La. 1998).
Cited by
- State v. Moore 847 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- State ex rel. SNW v. Mitchell 788 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- State ex rel. S.M. 733 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
- Russell v. Noullet 721 So. 2d 868 La. 1998
- Hebert v. Brown Bottling Group, Inc. 719 So. 2d 1043 La. 1998
- State, in Interest of Sm 719 So. 2d 445 La. 1998
- Hanson v. Benelli 719 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Sussmann 374 So. 2d 1256
- State v. Lassai 366 So. 2d 1389
- State Ex Rel. Robertson v. Maggio 341 So. 2d 366
Opinion text
In re State of Louisiana;—Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; *60 Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 12750-94; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW97-1393. Writ granted; revocation of probation reinstated. Because the state presented more than adequate factual support showing that Moore violated a term of his probation by-violating a law, La.C.Cr.P. art. 895(A); R.S. 15:542, and because Moore knew of the law, cf. State v. Sussmann, 374 So.2d 1256, 1259 (La.1979), no abuse of the district court’s discretion appears. La.C.Cr.P. art. 900; Sussmann, 374 So.2d at 1259 ; State v. Lassai, 366 So.2d 1389, 1391 (La.1978); State ex rel. Robertson v. Maggio, 341 So.2d 366, 370 (La.1976). TRAYLOR, J., not on panel.