Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Baker v. Frellsen, 32 La. Ann. 822.

16 citing documents.

Hunter v. Sandel 160 So. 87 La. 1935
Ann. 286 ; , on rehearing 32 La.
Alliance Trust Co. v. Streater 157 So. 726 La. 1934
Gottlieb v. Avery Realty Co. 157 So. 369 La. 1934
960 ; ; Drewes & Co. v. Ham, 157 La.
Nicholas v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland 152 So. 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Ann. 112 ; ; Succession of Baumgarden, 35 La.
Price v. Town of Ruston 148 So. 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Ducre v. Milner 126 So. 72 La. 1930
American Multigraph Sales Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co. 123 So. 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Ann. 732 .” In Baker vs. Frellsen, , an injunction case, the court said: “The surety on an injunction bond has incurred obligations, but has certain rights which cannot be taken away from him without his consent.
Typhoon Fan Co. v. Pilsbury 118 So. 70 La. 1927
Thomas v. Guilbeau, 35 La.
Ducros v. St. Bernard Cypress Co. 114 So. 654 La. 1927
Succession of Pavelka 109 So. 403 La. 1926
Ann. 112 ; ; Succession of Baumgarden, 35 La.
Keen Woolf v. Caldwell 108 So. 318 La. 1926
299 , .]” There will therefore be judgment in favor of the defendants in rule, relieving them from all liability on this appeal bond.
John Barkley & Co. v. Ham & Seymour 103 So. 245 La. 1921
Citizens' Bank of Columbia v. Bellamy Lumber Co. 73 So. 308 La. 1916
Succession of Baumgarden, 35 La.
New York Mercantile Co. v. W. M. Cady Lumber Co. 63 So. 304 La. 1913
888 ); but that, when, as in the present case, the allegations of the two suits are the same, the judgment on an exception of no cause or right of action is one on the merits of the case, and is a bar to a subsequent suit ( ; Nicholls v. Maddox, 52 La.
Davis v. Welch 55 So. 372 La. 1911
Studebaker Bros. Manufacturing v. Endom 26 So. 90 La. 1899
See also Baker vs. Frellson, ; 33 La.