Corkern v. Smith
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 24, 1926 4 La. App. 476; La., May 15, 1887 39 La. Ann. 712; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 1, 1974 294 So. 2d 261
Corkern v. Smith, 147 So. 2d 416 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962).
Cited by
- Ruppert v. Stout 231 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- Odom v. Texas Farm Products Co. 229 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1969
- West v. Kenknight 193 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
- Arnold v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co. 190 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
- Lagarde v. Smith 169 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
- Graham v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. 159 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
- Neuburger v. State ex rel. State Department of Highways 162 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
- Hernandez v. Pan American Fire & Casualty Co. 157 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
- Smith v. Henry 149 So. 2d 766 La. 1963
- Parker v. Smith 147 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Parker v. Smith 147 So. 2d 414
Opinion text
BOLIN, Judge. The claims herein are identical in every respect with those outlined in a companion case, Parker v. Smith et al., 147 So.2d 414 , except Mrs. Corkern, plaintiff, herein, was the daughter of the deceased. At the time of the accident, she was married to Dr. Robert Corkern and had resided at Alexandria for a number of years. For the reasons set forth in the companion case, the judgment appealed from is affirmed at appellants’ costs. Affirmed.