Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rain CII Carbon, LLC v. Turner Industries Group, LLC, 161 So. 3d 688.

22 citing documents.

Larry Madison Grimm v. Jennifer Elizabeth Grimm La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Succession of Glenda S. Love La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Jonathan Saucier and Tracy Saucier v. Waterfront East Homeowner's Association La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
App. 3 Cir. 3/ 19/ 14), and Spangler v. Chiasson, 95- 2113 ( La.
Amber L. Prepotente v. Chester L. Williams, Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company and Geico Secure Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
App. 3 Cir. 3/ 19/ 14), also see Spangler v. Chiasson, 95- 2113 ( La.
Pratimakone (Tommy) Aphaiyarath v. Lafayette Municipal Fire & Police Civil Service Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Pink Ladies Trucking, LLC v. Martin Yokum La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
3 Cir. 3/ 19/ 14), Uniform Rules— Courts of Appeal, Rule 4- 3.
Robert J. Sampia and Alfred McZeal, Jr. v. Billie Jean Doucet and/or Estate of Billie Jean La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Dontrale Phillips v. David Julian Foshee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Crystal Moore v. Christopher P. Moore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Lawrence Wilson Kingsley v. Ann Elizabeth Lange La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Ashley Nicole Matt Hoffpauier v. Daniel Wayne Hoffpauir La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
A Plus Home Care Services, LLC v. a Blessing Personal Home La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Russ Builders, L.L.C. v. Holy Family Limited Partnership La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Lewis v. B-3 Prop. 258 So. 3d 107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 3 Cir. 3/19/14), , 689 ).
Dearmon v. St. Ann Lodging, L.L.C. 255 So. 3d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 3 Cir. 3/19/14), , 689 and stating that "the motion [for appeal] was filed untimely for a writ application, and if we allowed the conversion, the writ application would be dismissed because of untimeliness").
Blake Dubroc and Melissa Dubroc v. Hollier's Specialty Roofing, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Bryan Reed v. Cowboy's Western Store and Trailer Sales, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 3/19/14), (while the motion for appeal could be construed to be a notice of intent to seek supervisory writs, it could not be construed as a timely one where it was filed more than thirty days from the court‘s ruling).
Susanna E. Duckering v. Rapides Healthcare System, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 3/19/14), (while the motion for appeal could be construed to be a notice of intent to seek supervisory writs, it could not be construed as a timely one where it was filed more than thirty days from the court’s ruling).
Duckering v. Rapides Healthcare System, L.L.C. 187 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 3/19/14) , (while the motion for appeal could be construed to be a notice of intent to seek supervisory writs, it could ■ not be construed as a timely one where it was filed more than thirty days from the court’s ruling).
Babineaux v. University Medical Center 177 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 3/19/14) , (while the motion for appeal could be construed to be a notice of intent to seek supervisory writs, it could not be construed as a timely one where it was filed more than thirty days from the court’s ruling).
McGinn v. Crescent City Connection Bridge Authority 174 So. 3d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Biosonix, LLC v. Luke 165 So. 3d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 3/19/14) , , this court addressed a similar situation and explained: Where there is a verbal interlocutory ruling that is subsequently reduced to a written judgment, time delays for filing a notice of intent to seek supervisory writs start running from the verbal ruling as there is no requirement that an interlocutory ruling be

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by