No. CA 3252 Precedential Processed

Barriffe v. Ortiz

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed September 16, 1985 · 476 So. 2d 371

Cited by

STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Scramuzza 673 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
STATE, DOTD v. Scramuzza 608 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Ortiz v. Barriffe 523 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Barriffe v. Ortiz 478 So. 2d 146 La. 1985

Opinion text

ARMSTRONG, Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. Although I agree with the majority opinion that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support a finding that Ms. Ortiz disclosed to various parties the substance of the taped conversations, I'do believe that there was sufficient evidence upon which the jury could base a finding that Ms. Ortiz had indeed taped some or all of the conversations in question. Given the evidence produced by defendants in the hearing on the motion for new trial, I believe this matter should be remanded for a new trial.