No. CA 84 1532
Precedential
Processed
Crabtree v. Carr
Crabtree v. Carr, 486 So. 2d 921 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986).
Cited by
- Hebert v. ALLIED SIGNAL INC. 577 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Watts v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. 574 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Crabtree v. Carr 488 So. 2d 690 La. 1986
Opinion text
PONDER, Judge, dissenting. For the immunity from tort to be available to a director, he must be engaged at the time of the injury in the “normal course and scope of his employment.” It is difficult for me to agree that the repairing of a kitchen stove can be within the course and scope of a director’s employment. But the statute goes further and requires that the *927 course and scope must be normal. I dissent.