No. CA 94 0430 Precedential Processed

McNally v. Teledyne Movible Offshore, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed December 22, 1994 · 650 So. 2d 267

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Picard v. Zeit Exploration Co., Inc. 636 So. 2d 922
Picard v. Zeit Exploration Co., Inc. 642 So. 2d 862
Deal v. International Paper Co. 632 So. 2d 870
State v. Rawlins 637 So. 2d 453
Hanks v. Shell Oil Co. 631 So. 2d 1189
Revere v. Coady 635 So. 2d 1118
Moore v. Crystal Oil Co. 626 So. 2d 792
In re Coffman 632 So. 2d 758

Opinion text

| xPITCHER, Judge, dissenting. I disagree with the result reached by the majority in this ease. I believe that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the work being performed was a part of Teledyne’s trade, business, or occupation. See, Picard v. Zeit Exploration Co., Inc., 92-2242 (La.App. 1st Cir. 3/11/94); 636 So.2d 922 , writ granted and judgment set aside, 94-1555 (La. 9/30/94); 642 So.2d 862 ; Deal v. International Paper Company, 632 So.2d 870 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1994), writ granted and judgment reversed, 94-0677 (La. 4/29/94); 637 So.2d 453 ; Hanks v. Shell Oil *271 Co., 93-737 (La.App. 5th Cir. 1/25/94); 631 So.2d 1189 , writ granted and judgment set aside, 94-0483 (La. 4/4/94); 635 So.2d 1118 ; Moore v. Crystal Oil Company, 626 So.2d 792 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1993), writ granted and judgment reversed, 93-3103 (La. 2/25/94); 632 So.2d 758 .