No. CA-5109
Precedential
Processed
Caron v. Bruno
Caron v. Bruno, 503 So. 2d 509 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986).
Cited by
- Caron v. Bruno 503 So. 2d 1020 La. 1987
Opinion text
LOBRANO, Judge, concurring. I agree that the lessee is an indispensible party and should be a named defendant in the lawsuit. However, the trial judge also dismissed plaintiff’s suit on an exception of no cause of action. I would reverse that ruling as the petition clearly states a cause of action.