State v. Lloyd
State v. Lloyd, 449 So. 2d 189 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984).
Cited by
- Succession of McClinton 736 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
- Atkins v. Roberts 561 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- Succession of MacK 535 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
- Succession of Ellis 486 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- Gale v. Hession 486 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Smith 430 So. 2d 31
- State v. Jackson 332 So. 2d 211
Opinion text
FORET, Judge. Defendant, Harrison Lloyd, was charged by a grand jury indictment with the crime of second degree murder, a violation of LSA-R.S. 14:30.1. On February 24, 1983, he was found guilty as charged by a unanimous verdict of a jury of twelve. Subsequently, he was sentenced to serve life imprisonment at hard labor without benefit of probation, parole or suspension of sentence. The defendant filed a motion for appeal, along with three formal assignments of error, but he failed to either brief or argue those assignments. Assignments neither briefed nor argued are considered abandoned. State v. Smith, 430 So.2d 31 (La.1983). Therefore, this case is reviewable only for errors discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without inspection of the evidence. LSA-C.Cr.P. Article 920; State v. Jackson, 332 So.2d 211 (La.1976). We have fully reviewed the record for these errors and find none. For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed. AFFIRMED.