No. CR82-815
Precedential
Processed
State v. Williams
State v. Williams, 439 So. 2d 663 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983).
Cited by
- State v. Hongo 625 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Gatson 434 So. 2d 1315
- State v. Mathews 375 So. 2d 1165
Opinion text
DOMENGEAUX, Judge, concurring. I agree completely with the majority opinion, but in keeping with my position on the review of facts doctrine I reiterate the views stated in my previous concurring opinion in State v. Gatson, 434 So.2d 1315 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1983). I feel that the continued application of the review of facts rationale set out in Jackson v. Virginia, supra, and State v. Mathews, 375 So.2d 1165 (La.1979), results in our appellate courts becoming nothing more than second guessers of the triers of fact.