No. CR84-358
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
State v. See
State v. See, 462 So. 2d 1373 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. See 462 So. 2d 1369
Opinion text
GUIDRY, Judge. For the reasons set forth in the consolidated matter of State v. See, 462 So.2d 1369 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1985), in which a separate decision is being rendered by us this day, the defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed. AFFIRMED.