Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Duhon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 915 So. 2d 950.

20 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Shelton Broadway La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Dionte Eugene Daugherty La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 11/2/05), (quoting State v. Smith, 02-719, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Daugherty 175 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 11/2/05) , (quoting State v. Smith, 02-719, p. 4 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Jerald C. Fowler La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Fowler 114 So. 3d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. J. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Bruce D. Dial La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Dial 25 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Jimmy James Mack La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Mikala L. January La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 11/2/05), (fine, costs, and fees, and reimbursement to IDB).
State v. January 993 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 11/2/05) , (fine, costs, and fees, and reimbursement to IDB).
State v. Davis 947 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Derick Dewayne Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Dustin K. Runyon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Runyon 944 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Daniel R. Fontenot, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 11/2/05), where this court stated that the trial court, not the probation officer, must establish a payment schedule for fees ordered as a condition of probation.
State v. Fontenot 934 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
App. 3 Cir. 11/2/05), , where this court stated that the trial court, not the probation officer, must establish a payment schedule for fees ordered as a condition of probation.
State v. SDG 931 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
App. 3 Cir. 11/2/05), -54 , a panel of this court recently explained that: *1253 This court has set forth the following standard to be used in reviewing excessive sentence claims: La.
State of Louisiana v. S.D.G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 11/2/05), - 54, a panel of this court recently explained that: This court has set forth the following standard to be used in reviewing excessive sentence claims: La.
State v. S.D.G. 931 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 11/2/05), -54 , a panel of this court recently explained that: *1253 This court has set forth the following standard to be used in reviewing excessive sentence claims: La.