No. K91-919
Precedential
Processed
State v. Marks
State v. Marks, 591 So. 2d 356 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991).
Cited by
- State Ex Rel. Marks v. Thompson 596 So. 2d 193 La. 1992
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Jenkins 573 So. 2d 218
- State v. Cutrera 558 So. 2d 611
Opinion text
WRIT DENIED: Dilaudid is a narcotic drug, see La.R.S. 40:961(23) and R.S. 40:964 Schedule II(A)(1)(1), and the proper sentencing provision for Dilaudid is La.R.S. 40:967(B)(1). We note that our decision in this matter differs from that reached in State v. Jenkins, 573 So.2d 218 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990) and the footnote in State v. Cutrera, 558 So.2d 611 (La.App. 1 Cir.1990). We respectfully disagree with those decisions.